The Objective Middle is Dead: You are a Xenophobic Nationalist, or a Secular Rationalist

We’re entering into a time in which it’s no longer possible to sit on the fence, or pretend there’s some middle ground between two warring armies.

You are either on the side of the xenophobic nationalist: Trump, Putin, and Europe’s Le Pen, Geert Wilders, Matteo Salvini, and Frauke Petry…

Or you are on the side of secular rationalism: Obama, Clinton, Sanders, and Europe’s Merkel, Hollande, and Corbyn.

To be fair, the views of these particular leaders vary somewhat, but the general bent of their beliefs doesn’t.

Xenophobic nationalists are prone to racism, bigotry, bullying, and bravado, using populist catchphrases and making broad, sweeping pronouncements to promote their polices, placing little worth on the value of government or government institutions.

Secular rationalists, on the other hand, use science, reason, and data to form policy positions, consider dissenting opinions, and above all, place great worth on the value of government and its institutions.

Moreover, xenophobic nationalists view facts as transient–opinions that can be molded and conformed to one’s views if convenient; disregarded if inconvenient. And in their place: alternative facts.

But as facts, reason, and data are the very pillars with which a secular rationalist builds their world view, they are immutable and deserve respect, because indeed, one cannot wish reality away, or pretend, over time, that it doesn’t exist.

Problem is, there’s no middle ground. No fence to sit on. No objective seat from which to watch the carnage.

Sure, news organizations for the most part accurately report what’s going on, but the xenophobic nationalists don’t believe them, because they have their own alternative facts (and their own alternative media), so what the mainstream media says only matters to those who care about actual facts, data, and expertise. Which, by default, means they’re on the side of the secular rationalists.

That’s how the XN’s see it anyway.

So, I guess it’d be nice if everyone would stop fucking pretending that there’s this reasonable middle ground, or that people like me who are willing to tell it like it is are just bitter partisans. Maybe some of them are. But I’m not.

The truth is: you either hate people who are different than you and want to punish them and use government to codify a wall around the majority race/religion of your country, or you want to use science, facts, reason, and data to make the best decisions, while respecting everyone’s right to live and be free.

It’s one or the other.

Now choose.

If you like what we’re doing here at, please help us out by making a donation. Every dollar counts. Also, check out my new novel, Cherry City Pulp! An awkward, sexy, funny, and sometimes violent story about young people in small town America. If you can’t make a donation at this time, the other way you can help us is to spread the word–so please, like, share, email, tweet, and/or retweet our posts. Remember to follow me on twitter @chuckingrocks or email me:

About The Author: Jay Scott


  • Reply john legend

    youre a dumb cunt nigger, sorry that i said that but im jsut tryiong to make you mad with that because i know you hate that kind of stuff. i would say it to you in person but i think you would insight violence upon me if i just said a word because you probably dont care about free speech even if it’s mean or hateful or anything else. but aye finally amazed that ochs is done with all this racism shit. even i know yall teachers talk about it behind our backs. our being student. btw didnt care about grammer because i know youre a english teacher. loe the house of the scorpians book tho

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.